Renew On Line (UK) 30

Extracts from the March-April 2001 edition of Renew
These extracts only represent about 25% of it

   Welcome   Archives   Bulletin         
 

 

Wave gets started

 Offshore Wind also gets started

Green Fuel Funding and Rural Renewal

Green Power market : Future Energy

 Waste Burn Risks: MSW and MBM

Energy Crops and the RO

 Electric exploitation: power price fiddles

 DETR’s Cleaner Vehicles

 No Solar VAT

Wind in Scotland- ups and downs  

 UK Election - policies

 Big Dam’s Blocked

 EU Progress: REFIT OK?

 Fallout from COP-6: EU, US, Australia

 Nuclear News and Analysis

 Forum: Micro Power

EU Progress on Renewables

Breakthrough on renewables targets

MEP’s have insisted that EU member states should be set binding targets for increasing the share of electricity generated from renewable energy sources under the draft renewables directive proposed by the European Commission (EC) last May. Previously the percentage targets were seen as ‘indicative’ rather than compulsory. According to END’s Daily ‘The move signals an impending battle with EU governments over the issue because most oppose the idea.’

Under pressure from ministers, the Commission had dropped its own attempts to propose binding targets However, in its first reading of the draft directive, the euro-parliament called for targets to be made mandatory and for a "burden sharing" arrangement to be agreed, similar to the one used to distribute responsibility for meeting the EU’s greenhouse gas emission reduction target under the Kyoto protocol.

The parliament backed the Commission’s aim for renewables to meet 12% of EU energy needs by 2010. But it calculated that this would require 23.5% of electricity to come from renewables by the same date rather than the 22.1% suggested by the Commission.

END’s reports ‘Acknowledging that long negotiations on binding targets would hinder progress on finalising the directive, MEPs said binding targets should be agreed after its adoption, though with a gap not greater than one year. Renewable electricity traded across borders should be counted to the importing country’s target, they said, and the Commission should provide "indications" of longer-term targets for 2020 by the end of 2004.’

Another key issue is the proposed harmonisation of financial support structures for renewables. The EC had been pushing hard for this, but has had to retreat following opposition by many member countries- and by defenders of REFIT subsidy schemes- and had come up with a compromise of ‘waiting for five years’. However the euro-parliament saw even this as too soon and called for the whole thing to be left "until 2010 at the earliest"- if this risked "jeopardising the continuation or effectiveness" of national schemes.

Renewable energy proponents were delighted by the euro MEPs new approach. Green MEP Claude Turmes said it was a "major breakthrough."

Waste Combustion stays out

The MEPs also took at look at the details of the energy sources included in the Renewable Directive, and defeated proposals by some MEPs to classify waste incineration as renewable- by the narrowest of margins (226 to 222). MEPs did nevertheless vote to expand the directive’s definition of renewable sources, calling for inclusion of annual peat growth, landfill gas, biodegradable pulp and paper industry waste and the biodegradable fraction of municipal waste as fuels considered to come from "non-fossil" sources. However, note that there are still further rounds to go before all these decisions are finalised!

Follow-up: for the debate see http://www.europarl.eu.int/cre/pdf/20001115ii.pdf   for the amendments to the Directive see:

http://www3.europarl.eu.int/omk/omnsapir.so/calendar?APP=DOC&TYPE=PV2&FILE=p000-11-16en.doc&LANGUE=EN   and http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/en/com/dat/2000/en_500PC0279.html

Patchy Progress on EU Renewables

ALTENER 2000 Conference

Very uneven progress is being made by Europe to achieve the EU's targets to replace energy from fossil fuel sources with ecologically sound energy from renewable sources. Some countries are doing well in certain sectors, experts at Europe’s major forum in the field heard at the Altener 2000 conference at Toulouse, SW France, last October.

Europe's goal is to double its renewable energy to achieve a 12 per cent proportion of all energy used originating from renewable sources by 2010. To reach that target, countries and sectors that are lagging behind have to be given more attention, according to Mr Francois Lamoureux, Director General of the Commission’s directorate-general that co-ordinates the programme. This would need to involve investment-friendly legislation, tax reform, financing, and improved co-operation including more public-private partnerships. Otherwise, on the basis of current forecasts the EU might only achieve a 9.8% contribution from renewables by 2010.

In 1999, wind power in Europe reached 9182 MW, dominating the world total of 13356, and compared with 6427 in 1998. Leaders in Europe were Germany, with 4440, Denmark with 1761 and Spain with 1478 MW capacity. In the biogas subsector of biomass renewable energy, in 1999 the lead country by far was Spain, with 13 900 GWh, out of the EU total of 22205. Sweden came second, with 1360 GWh production.

It was noted that solar thermal energy has increased significantly in Austria and Germany, in spite of having less promising natural resources than in southern countries.

Overall, they say, while countries such as Denmark, Germany and Spain have experienced a real take-off, others, while having even higher potential, have not been developing at as high a rate. And that, sadly, includes the UK

Source:WIRE See Agores: Detailed information on the EU and Member States’ renewable energy programmes is available at: www.agores.org which links to many other relevant websites.

* France recently expanded its windpower target by six times- to 3GW by 2010, nearly ten times the current UK wind capacity. It may also introduce a REFIT type support scheme .

Euro Green Power Trading

Two programmes have been announced in Europe to accelerate the growth of the renewable power generation. By 2002 the Danish Energy Agency hopes to have a fully operating marketplace for the purchase and sale of green power certificates. Certificates will be issued by the Agency to producers relative to the amount of green power generated. Customers can then purchase certificates and thus become investors in renewable energy. The Agency’s system makes use of legislation in Denmark that obliges end users to purchase 20% of their electricity from renewable sources by 2003.

Another scheme- the Renewable Energy Certification System (RECS) should be open for business on the Internet shortly. The system, set up voluntarily by 50 companies, also issues certificates based on qualified green power production. However, since the scheme is market based, not helped (yet) by government legislation, the initial attraction to the system for producers would be for an environmentally friendly public image. See the DEA at http://www.ens.dk/uk/index.asp  and RECS at http://www.recs.org/

German REFIT support is legal

An attempt by a utility company to halt the generous financial support scheme for German renewable energy generators has been deflected following a ruling by an advisor to the European Court of Justice (ECJ) that the new scheme ‘does not amount to a state subsidy’ and so should not be subject to EU rules limiting state aids.

If upheld by the court, this ruling could open the way for similar schemes across the EU, despite the EC’s preference for schemes with a stronger competitive element. Germany’s 1990 "feed-in" law obliges electricity distributors to buy at a premium all renewably generated electricity offered to them by generators in their distribution area.

The law has led to an enormous expansion of German renewables capacity.

In 1998 Preussen Elektra challenged the law in a German regional court, claiming it contravened EU state aid rules and demanding reimbursement of the extra costs it has borne. The court referred the matter to the ECJ. ECJ’s advisor, Advocate General Jacobs has now said that the feed-in law was not a subsidy because the financial support comes directly from utilities such as PE and not from "state resources". Although this assessment is not legally binding on the full court, it nevertheless usually rules in accordance with advocate generals’ opinions.

ENDS Daily commented ‘Though a setback for PE, the ruling is potentially a bigger reverse for the European Commission, which has long opposed the feed-in system as potentially disruptive to the EU's single market’. The EC had previously warned Germany that it might challenge the scheme as an illegal subsidy, prompting several changes to it. ENDS added It has not yet taken similar action against Spain, however, which also operates a successful feed-in scheme. The Commission also tried unsuccessfully to block feed-in schemes EU-wide in draft proposals for a directive on electricity from renewables.’

According to ENDS, an ECJ judgement reaching the same conclusion as Mr Jacobs would effectively exempt feed-in initiatives from Commission scrutiny. "This is a major breakthrough for renewables," Green MEP and clean energy campaigner Claude Turmes told ENDS Daily. "It's important for the whole of Europe; it means Spain is also secure."

Never the less, a spokesman for EU competition commissioner Mario Monti told Reuters that the EU's executive was maintaining its opposition to the interpretation. "We think that even if the state is not directly involved in giving a subsidy... it can still be a subsidy because the obligation for companies to buy electricity is a legal obligation."

  • Heat Trap: The German government plans to draft an energy efficiency ordinance so that building energy efficiency would have to be measured according to primary rather than end-use energy consumption. Horrified, HEA, Germany's association of electricity suppliers, equipment manufacturers and electricians, said the government's plan would effectively be an "electrical heating ban." But environmental group WWF has welcomed the government’s approach. They say it would leave builders and architects free to choose the technical means to comply with the law

NATTA/Renew Subscription Details

Renew is the bi-monthly 30 plus page newsletter of NATTA, the Network for Alternative Technology and Technology Assessment. NATTA members gets Renew free. NATTA membership cost £18 pa (waged) £12pa (unwaged), £6 pa airmail supplement (Please make cheques payable to 'The Open University', NOT to 'NATTA')

Details from NATTA , c/o EERU,
The Open University,
Milton Keynes, MK7 6AA
Tel: 01908 65 4638 (24 hrs)
E-mail: S.J.Dougan@open.ac.uk

The full 32 (plus) page journal can be obtained on subscription
The extracts here only represent about 25% of it.

This material can be freely used as long as it is not for commercial purposes and full credit is given to its source.

The views expressed should not be taken to necessarily reflect the views of all NATTA members, EERU or the Open University.