Renew On Line (UK) 53 |
Extracts from NATTA's journal |
||
Welcome Archives Bulletin |
|
9. Global Developments IEA Research on renewables falls… The International Energy Agency’s report ‘Renewable Energy- Market and Policy Trends in IEA Countries’, says that between 1974 and 2002 nuclear fission received around 47.3% of the overall energy RD&D funding in the IEA countries, and nuclear fusion around 10.5%, while renewables only received about 8.1%. Moreover, research in renewables has dropped by 40% since the rise after the mid 1970’s OPEC oil crisis. RD&D budgets in IEA countries between 1974 and 1986 totalled $158,240 billion. Of that, 16.7% or $26,496bn was allocated to renewables, including hydro. During this period, the research budget for renewables was $2,208 bn p.a., while $8,607bn was spent on conservation, $15,948bn on nuclear fusion, $20,559 bn on fossil fuels & $84,866bn on nuclear fission.
* The World Wind Energy Association’s third conference, held in Beijing, last year with 1000 delegates, called for the creation of an International Renewable Energy Agency, and an International Renewable Energy Development Fund, as has been recommended at the Bonn conference last year. …but Solar hits 100 million The world has installed more than 100 million square metres of solar thermal collectors, which are reducing CO2 emissions by 18 megatonnes a year. This milestone was achieved in 2001, according to a report from the International Energy Agency, ‘Solar Heating Worldwide: Markets & Contributions to the Energy Supply 2001’.
Globally, glazed collectors comprise almost half of the market- 49 million sq.m. Another 27.7 million sq.m are unglazed and there are 22.3 million sq.m evacuated tube collectors.
‘No’ to Large Hydro... The International Rivers Network, (IRN) has produced a declaration calling for large hydropower to be excluded as a renewable energy option, which has been endorsed by 260 groups in 62 countries. The declaration was released at the international renewable energy conference in Bonn last June. Instead of large hydro, the declaration says that funds allocated to reduce environmental impacts of energy and to increase energy security should be used to promote modern biomass, geothermal, wind, solar, marine energy and small hydro sites that are less than 10 MW capacity.
Promoters of large hydro“regularly underestimate costs and exaggerate benefits” and large hydro is “slow, lumpy, inflexible and getting more expensive,” with large hydro plants taking six years to build- while “wind turbines and solar panels can start delivering benefits and repaying loans within months of entering construction.” Finally, IRN say that many countries are already over-dependent on hydro and yet the large reservoirs are often rendered non-viable by sedimentation. Of the twelve reasons for avoiding large hydro the IRN give, perhaps the most powerful is that, as the WCD argued, the biomass coming down stream can be trapped by the dam and rot producing methane- in some cases (in hot climates) the result being that the climate impact of a hydro project may be greater than a coal fired plant of similar generation capacity. The IRN say that “a growing body of evidence indicates that dams and reservoirs are globally significant sources of emissions”. It also notes that the changing climate also holds “major implications” for the safety and performance of dams, with increased droughts reducing hydro generation and water storage, while increased floods threaten dam safety and may increase reservoir sedimentation.
...but Small Hydro can be good The IRN say that ‘while there is no directly proportional relationship between the installed capacity of a hydro plant and its impacts, in general one can expect higher impacts as the size of the project increases. Small hydro can, if responsibly implemented, be environmentally and socially low-impact and provide many of the benefits of new renewables, in particular providing power and related development benefits to dispersed rural communities. If badly implemented, however, without regard to community needs or its impacts on rivers and streams, small hydro can replicate many of the negative consequences of larger schemes. The cumulative impacts of multiple small hydro schemes on small watersheds are of particular concern. It is thus imperative that small hydro schemes be carefully evaluated on a case-by-case basis’.
· The report, “Twelve Reasons to Exclude Large Hydro from Renewables Initiatives,” was published by IRN with Friends of the Earth International, Oxfam America, and a number of other groups, including the UK’s ITDG. · The International Hydropower Association came back with a riposte- see our Technology Section and their web site: www.hydropower.org. It claims that the IRN analysis is based on limited data and ignores the emissions that would have been produced locally in any case, without a dam. Climate Change 'a real threat'
Meanwhile, Sir David King, the UK governmen’s chief scientific adviser, has warned that global warning posed a greater threat than al-Qaida, and claimed that the seas would rise 6-7 metres if the Greenland ice cap melted and a further 110 metres if Antarctica melted and that “on current trends, cities like London, New York and New Orleans will be among the first to go”. And recent reports suggest that the Greenland ice sheet is melting up to 10 times faster than was previously thought... although just to confuse things, in a recent OU Earth Science Dept. report, Prof. Vincent Gauci claimed that acid rain may help reduce climate change since it reduces methane generation.
Last word? 'There's plenty of oil’ At the beginning of 2004‘known supply potential rose to an all-time peak of almost 1,150bn barrels- enough to sustain the now relatively modest increase in annual demand for over 25 years. But new discoveries- including giant fields- continue to be made. Each of the 36 countries currently with reserves in excess of 1bn barrels will contribute significantly to future supplies- and other countries are expected to join them as exploration successes enable their reserves to grow.’ Peter R Odell, Emeritus Professor of energy studies, Erasmus University, Rotterdam. |
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||