Renew On Line (UK) 37

Extracts from the May-June 2002 edition of Renew
These extracts only represent about 25% of it
   Welcome   Archives   Bulletin         
 

Stories in this issue

Great hopes for the Renewables Obligation

Government backs Wave and Tidal Stream power

Renewable Growth : UK Renewables Boom

Wind Opposition

PIU Report Reactions

Other UK Green Energy Sector news

European News- offshore wind, REFIT still best

N.American News - US emissions rise

World News – more Shell scenarios

Nuclear News - Nine new UK plants?

In the rest of Renew 137

Other UK Green Energy Sector news NFFO/SRO cut

The Fossil Fuel Levy in England and Wales, which is used to support renewable energy projects contracted under under the Non Fossil Fuel Obligation (NFFO) by allowing supply companies to add a small charge on consumers bills, has been reduce to zero from the previous level of 0.3%.

Ofgem, the Energy Regulator, explained that it anticipates that over the coming months there will be sufficient funds already accrued form previous levy income to make up the difference between payments which the Renewables Scheme guarantees to generators and the amount they will be able to secure in the market. NFFO 1 and 2 projects have already lost their levy support, since they were only contracted up to 1998, and some projects supported under subsequent rounds of the NFFO have yet to get started.

Under transitional arrangements, existing NFFO contracts will continue to be honoured, and the levy may yet have to be re-started to meet the costs, but for new projects the NFFO system is being replaced by the Renewables Obligation which will require supply companies to source 10% of the power from renewables by 2010, and will lead to a surcharge building up in stages to perhaps 4% by 2010.

In parallel, the levy associated with Scottish Renewables Order has also been reduced, but only down from 1.2% to 0.6%, presumably reflecting the rapid take up of SRO-3 wind projects. Like the NFFO, the SRO will soon be replaced, but the proposed new Renewables Obligation Scotland, has a more ambitions target than the RO - a 18% from renewables by 2010.

Green Power Guidelines

OFGEM, the energy regulator, has published proposed guidelines designed to help customers who want to choose an electricity supply that is more environmentally friendly. The numbers have at last begun to grow. According to www.greenprices.com UK subscriptions have risen to over 45,000, still of course dwarfed by the 280,000 in Germany and the 680,000 in the Netherlands. But we hear that London Electricity and Powergen have recently been innundated with subscribers to their schemes

The new draft guidelines set out the criteria that OFGEM expects company tariffs to meet if they are to be described as ‘green’. They have been prompted by the changes in the regulations for renewable energy supply, namely the Climate Change Levy renewables exemption and the Renewables Obligation. The guidelines:

· define key terms of what forms of generation constitute ‘green energy’

· explain the key features consumers should expect from a ‘green’ tariff

· clearly describe which rules, regulations and guidelines apply in this area

Ofgem’s Director of Social and Environmental Affairs, Virginia Graham, said: "Competition in the energy market has made it possible for customers to get all or part of their electricity from suppliers who offer green tariffs. These guidelines aim to give customers the confidence that a green tariff is actually contributing positively to the environment. The guidelines, which are advisory, will also help suppliers to understand the importance of accuracy and transparency in green supply offerings."

The Guidelines are not in fact very explicit on what is or isn’t green energy.

They say "it is not the purpose of the document to set strict definitions for what technologies constitute ‘green’ energy", but a little annoyingly they then say however it is important that there is general consistency in approach’ and add there is a core of technologies which are generally understood to be renewables. These include landfill gas, sewage gas, hydro, wind, energy crops and other biomass, geothermal power, solar, tidal and wave power. Other renewable technologies include co-firing of biomass and energy from incineration of mixed municipal and industrial wastes. These technologies are arguably of less environmental benefit in many peoples perceptions’. In particular, they note that waste incineration is not eligible in the Renewables Obligation or the Renewables Obligation Scotland.

The proposed rules themselves are fairly straight forward, along the lines of ‘legal, truthful and honest trading’ as in the advertising standards, and include a prohibition against the use of ‘energy which is purchased by suppliers as part of their Renewable Obligation’. Any premium charged should be directed either to the additional cost of purchasing renewable energy from non RO/ROS accredited sources or the cost of obtaining ROCs which are not presented as part of the RO’.

OFGEMs "Guidelines on Green Supply Offerings. A Consultation Document" are at www.ofgem.gov.uk or phone on 0116 277 2617

Secure Energy

The Select Committee on Trade and Industry recently produced a report on Energy Security, a subject which had come to the fore after the energy crisis in California. They noted that, at present, the UK enjoys a high level of diversity and security of supply, with electricity generating capacity currently exceeding demand by more than 30%. But, looking to the future, they warned that consumers, who had been lulled into a false sense of security by the recent energy prices cuts, had to be made aware that the cost of maintaining energy supplies in a sustainable fossil free way was going to be expensive, whether it was the 1p/kWh subsidy that the nuclear industry told them they would need to be economically viable or the 3p/kwh RO price cap for renewables.

Even that might not be enough, and the Committee were not confident that the current 10% by 2010 renewable target would be met. In particular they felt that NETA was undermining the development of a diverse range of energy supplies, and felt that the government needed to play more of a role in ensuring longer term security of supply We have not yet heard any evidence that leads us to believe that the market is sufficiently far-sighted to guarantee enough reserve generating capacity without some element of planning by Government or one of its agents’.

We’ll review the report in Renew 137.

Meanwhile, for a lively, if odd, debate on energy, with a strong contrarian element, see: www.spiked-online.com/sections/science/debates/energy/

NATTA/Renew Subscription Details

Renew is the bi-monthly 30 plus page newsletter of NATTA, the Network for Alternative Technology and Technology Assessment. NATTA members gets Renew free. NATTA membership cost £18 pa (waged) £12pa (unwaged), £6 pa airmail supplement (Please make cheques payable to 'The Open University', NOT to 'NATTA')

Details from NATTA , c/o EERU,
The Open University,
Milton Keynes, MK7 6AA
Tel: 01908 65 4638 (24 hrs)
E-mail: S.J.Dougan@open.ac.uk

The full 32 (plus) page journal can be obtained on subscription
The extracts here only represent about 25% of it.

This material can be freely used as long as it is not for commercial purposes and full credit is given to its source.

The views expressed should not be taken to necessarily reflect the views of all NATTA members, EERU or the Open University.