|
5. Greening London
Powering London
into the 21st century, a new report from PB Power, for Greenpeace and
the Mayor of London, claims that decentralising London’s energy
would be more efficient in cutting the city’s CO2 emissions, and
the demand for imported gas, as opposed to pursuing a centralised nuclear
power focused national energy policy. Greenpeace says, the report provides
‘a practical blueprint for shifting London’s energy away
from dependence on centralised production, which wastes two thirds of
energy generated, towards a more independent, decentralised approach
to energy production which gets more value for taxpayers’ money’
and ‘lays out a vision for London that builds on approaches already
successfully adopted in Denmark, where decentralised energy provides
over 50% of energy supplies and the Netherlands where it supplies over
40% Closer to home, Woking Council has cut its own CO2 emissions by
77.4% between 1991 and 2004 a result of decentralising its energy supplies’.
Mayor Ken Livingstone said: ‘As this new study shows, we stand
a far better chance of achieving Government targets on carbon reductions
by investing in decentralised energy. Nuclear power is neither the cheapest,
the safest, or the most reliable way to reduce greenhouse gases. We
don’t have time to make mistakes in tackling climate change. The
nuclear lobby is working overtime. Rather than spending taxpayers’
money on the failed technology of the past, I hope the Government will
invest in the most efficient, proven solutions to combat global warming:
greater energy efficiency, decentralised energy and renewable energy.’
The report examines four different paths London could take to supply
its future energy needs. It found that if a high decentral energy scenario
is adopted, London could reduce CO2 emissions from buildings by almost
32%; cut its primary energy demand by up to 35% compared to a scenario
involving centralised, new nuclear plants; reduce its gas consumption
by up to 15% compared to a nuclear scenario; and enable London to generate
64% of its own electricity and 43% of its own heat in London.
See: www.greenpeace.org.uk/poweringlondon/
More in Renew 163.
But not
Devon…
Torridge District Council in Devon has rejected Peninsular Powers plans
for a £43m 23 MW biomass plant on the former World War II Winkleigh
airfield. Local objectors said it was would be too big and would involve
excessive transport. The SW Regional Development Agency, which had spent
£589,000 on the project, said the decision was a setback to the
development of biomass in the region.
|
|
NATTA/Renew
Subscription Details
Renew is the bi-monthly 30
plus page newsletter of NATTA, the Network for Alternative
Technology and Technology Assessment. NATTA members gets Renew
free. NATTA membership cost £18 pa (waged) £12pa (unwaged),
£6 pa airmail supplement (Please make cheques payable to 'The
Open University', NOT to 'NATTA')
Details from NATTA , c/o EERU,
The Open University,
Milton Keynes, MK7 6AA
Tel: 01908 65 4638 (24 hrs)
E-mail: S.J.Dougan@open.ac.uk
|
|
|
|
|